Comments on: eAccelerator vs APC on PHP 5.2.9 http://blog.a2o.si/2009/07/07/eaccelerator-vs-apc-on-php-5-2-9/ Un*x system engineering Mon, 30 May 2011 22:14:54 +0200 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 By: Phoenix http://blog.a2o.si/2009/07/07/eaccelerator-vs-apc-on-php-5-2-9/comment-page-1/#comment-18143 Phoenix Mon, 30 May 2011 20:49:17 +0000 http://blog.a2o.si/?p=99#comment-18143 If this helps anyone, eAccalerator rocks. Much better than APC and all its cumbersome PECL nonsense. Using it perfectly in 2011 with CentOS 64 bit on quad core with 8GB RAM. Not that that matters, but just to let you know that it works perfectly fine, and is still faster than APC and XCache in our homegrown tests. If this helps anyone, eAccalerator rocks. Much better than APC and all its cumbersome PECL nonsense. Using it perfectly in 2011 with CentOS 64 bit on quad core with 8GB RAM. Not that that matters, but just to let you know that it works perfectly fine, and is still faster than APC and XCache in our homegrown tests.

]]> By: bostjan http://blog.a2o.si/2009/07/07/eaccelerator-vs-apc-on-php-5-2-9/comment-page-1/#comment-1049 bostjan Mon, 01 Mar 2010 23:02:46 +0000 http://blog.a2o.si/?p=99#comment-1049 @Lumega: My first respnse was: "It does seem so, I've just done a test install of PHP 5.3.1 and EAccelerator does not compile against it. APC does." But then I checked EAC site and found 0.9.6 release, which works perfectly with PHP 5.3.1. And it was released not even a month ago, so I can not agree that it is dying. Maybe very slowly:) @Lumega:
My first respnse was:
“It does seem so, I’ve just done a test install of PHP 5.3.1 and EAccelerator does not compile against it. APC does.”

But then I checked EAC site and found 0.9.6 release, which works perfectly with PHP 5.3.1. And it was released not even a month ago, so I can not agree that it is dying. Maybe very slowly:)

]]> By: Lumega http://blog.a2o.si/2009/07/07/eaccelerator-vs-apc-on-php-5-2-9/comment-page-1/#comment-1043 Lumega Sun, 28 Feb 2010 17:38:50 +0000 http://blog.a2o.si/?p=99#comment-1043 i like EA, but last releases show me what EA slowly die... maybe APC win. i like EA, but last releases show me what EA slowly die… maybe APC win.

]]> By: Boštjan Škufca http://blog.a2o.si/2009/07/07/eaccelerator-vs-apc-on-php-5-2-9/comment-page-1/#comment-469 Boštjan Škufca Tue, 01 Dec 2009 00:10:48 +0000 http://blog.a2o.si/?p=99#comment-469 Aco (about Xcache): I was only interested in comparing eAccelerator and APC. eAccelerator because it has been stable and high-performing for me since the days of TurckMM cache. APC for its entanglement in the PHP development process itself (it is part of PECL and Rasmus Lerdorf and Ilia Alshanetsky are its maintainers). Aco (about Xcache): I was only interested in comparing eAccelerator and APC. eAccelerator because it has been stable and high-performing for me since the days of TurckMM cache. APC for its entanglement in the PHP development process itself (it is part of PECL and Rasmus Lerdorf and Ilia Alshanetsky are its maintainers).

]]> By: Henrik Olsen http://blog.a2o.si/2009/07/07/eaccelerator-vs-apc-on-php-5-2-9/comment-page-1/#comment-465 Henrik Olsen Mon, 30 Nov 2009 21:10:44 +0000 http://blog.a2o.si/?p=99#comment-465 You can see APC stats with the included script. See http://www.electrictoolbox.com/apc-php-cache-information/. You can see APC stats with the included script. See http://www.electrictoolbox.com/apc-php-cache-information/.

]]> By: Aco http://blog.a2o.si/2009/07/07/eaccelerator-vs-apc-on-php-5-2-9/comment-page-1/#comment-96 Aco Fri, 21 Aug 2009 01:54:38 +0000 http://blog.a2o.si/?p=99#comment-96 what about xcache?? what about xcache??

]]>